I have a friend who resigned from their training provider after the cadetship for various reasons. The company is now trying to recover costs due to him signing a return of service agreement at the start of the cadetship. The company are threatening civil action and have provided a list of costs that were incurred for their training. The MCA website states that Smart funding covers approx 50% of actual training costs and is paid directly to the training provider. Should this be considered in the companies list of costs incurred as at the moment they are asking for the full amount of costs? Does my friend have a leg to stand on to argue this point? Does anyone know if there is any way of him finding out exactly how much funding the company was given for him on his own?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Comment